Still no place to live : The local barriers to the accessory dwelling unit revolution

California homeowners continue to face significant obstacles when attempting to build accessory dwelling units, despite state legislation designed to streamline the approval process.

The challenges are exemplified by a Malibu family's struggle to construct an ADU for an elderly relative with medical needs, highlighting how local government resistance is undermining state housing initiatives.

Jason and Elizabeth Riddick sought to build an ADU on their Malibu property to house Elizabeth's 82-year-old mother, who suffers from immunodeficiency and other medical conditions requiring specialized care.

The unit would allow the family to provide necessary support while maintaining the mother's independence and reducing health risks from close contact with three young children.

However, Malibu city officials rejected the permit application, citing conflicts with the Local Coastal Program, and denied a disability accommodation request by suggesting alternatives such as rearranging the existing home or placing the elderly woman in assisted living.

The case illustrates a broader pattern across California municipalities that are resisting state ADU reforms intended to increase housing supply.

ADUs, which include garage apartments, basement units, and backyard cottages built on existing residential lots, represent a key component of market-based solutions to address California's housing shortage.

For property developers and homeowners, the ongoing local resistance suggests that navigating ADU construction may remain challenging despite favorable state policies, potentially requiring legal intervention to enforce compliance with state housing laws.